Friday, October 8, 2021

Still Unhealthy

It has taken a long time, but I'm fairly convinced of the mechanics of this market.  It is a bit manipulated, but like damming the Mississippi River, somethings cannot be stopped.

It starts with Greenspan in '87, where it ends?  I don't know.

QE funnels money into asset markets.  The shadow banking systems is more important than regulated banking.  All assets, real estate, equities, fixed income, cryptocurrencies.  There are more on this list, they are boosted by QE.  The mechanism involves algorithmic trading and has been a turbocharger for Federal Reserve policy moves since the financial crisis.  They know it and use it, anyone would.  But how do you stop the party without a hangover?  That's why I stopped drinking.  Well that and God took the urge.  Ok, just God.  Credit where credit is due.

Wednesday, January 20, 2021

Unhealthy market

Uncertainty is a rich valuation's enemy.

I wrote that in 2008.  Never posted it or wrote anymore...  Was just saved as a draft.

This fits with the theme of this blog perfectly.

I has been a while!

I've changed things up.  Now, I would like to be of no help.  The Michael Jordan of Not Helpfulness.  You should probably do the opposite of whatever I say.

I bring nothing to the table.

Don't buy bitcoin.  Wait, what are the rules?  There you have it.  Why shouldn't you buy it?  Because it goes up.  Somebody explained it to me once.  You see, you buy it, it goes up and you sell it.  Pretty cool.  But I recommend not buying it so you can have less money.

Thursday, January 13, 2011

More on credit cards...

Happy Hour (2 beers) + Happier Hour (s) (4 beers) = Headache, I’m 38, one day I’ll learn that it is ok to stop at 2, one day.

Yeah GOOG and AAPL don’t bring much except the hardware / software in the handset currently. I suspect that Google is hoping to capture some data and get really local when it comes down to it, but that is pure speculation. But let’s stick with the speculation. They want to know what transactions are happening and when. Why? Because that is worth a lot, when they know what was just purchased and where. Apple, I’m never sure about, but they probably have a plan. Of course, it would have to be acknowledged that you are sharing your info for deals. Example, let’s assume that I had some discipline and I was about to call it after 2 beers last night. As, I’m checking out (very easy in this scenario), Google feeds the merchant some info that I’m easily sold on a ½ price beer and burger combo (they sold me on it before). As I’m checking out, I get a coupon for a ½ price beer/burger combo. I stay, get drunk and spend a lot more, everyone gets paid off of my poor judgment. The possibilities are limitless. Instead of just getting chips at the table, Google lets the Bellagio know that “Big Fish Lee” just asked for a stack of black chips at the craps table. They are all over you trying to get you stay in their casino, comping rooms and whatever. Basically a very localized and targeted Groupon/Loyalty program combo. Grocery stores have been trying to do this for years with the coupons printed on the back of the receipts using your loyalty card for ID – not real-time. These examples are worth a lot, but I just made them up off of the top of my head, I guarantee there are much smarter people figuring out all kinds of innovative advertising systems. Effective local advertising is the Holy Grail for SMB’s and Google knows this, which is why they tried to snatch Groupon up and why Groupon was smart in giving them the Heisman.

I think that eventually the 2% fee that you pay will be eaten away. Acknowledging that I’m no expert on the subject, I’d guess that number was originally the cost of a guaranteed transaction for the merchant (V/MA take the fraud risk), but I have no clue. In addition, processing costs had to be higher in the days that they had a credit card machine which took a physical imprint of the card, requiring the them to process a bunch of paper on the backend, however this does not cost as much to do when it is an all-IT solution at scale. Probably why MA has 50% operating margins? I know that PayPal even charges more, starting at 2.9% + $0.30. Why? It is an all-IT solution! But a sketchy one. It is pretty sketchy sending money online with not much more than an email account, a password and a link to a bank/card. A question that I have is the following: If you fill your PayPal account with a credit card, I guess they are being charged 2% and then charging you (the merchant) 2.9%? I don’t know, not worth figuring out. In any event, PayPal is a legit player now and will compete for transactions with MA and V, especially in the connected world. Why I think the charges go down is as a result more competition, but the but the enabling technology allowing this competition to compete will be that is that it is possible to have a lot more factors of authentication and thus allowing for smaller players to get involved without the risk. It is possible to have your ID embedded in your phone so that the payment and ID are intertwined, and then you could enter a pin to complete the transaction, furthermore it would be possible to have other stuff like GPS data as well etc (so that they know you are actually there). In other words it could be a VERY secure transaction and one that doesn’t require a 2% surcharge.

My secret service buddy was headed to bust some MoneyGram fraud scheme last night. I asked him why they (MoneyGram / Western Union) even still exist and he said basically for sketchy practices (fraud or to get around something). So there will also probably be those who create systems for these sketchy practices and charge higher fees. Will drug dealers be bumping phones?

Lee, you will not replace your card with a phone, I’m certain of that. But I’d bet Jake and Mike will and they’ll call you “old fashioned” …

Days of the Credit Cards Numbered?

Days of the credit card are numbered, part 2. I have spouted off about this for some time now, but it seems that there is a lot of activity in the area of Near Field Communication capability to be placed in cell phones. In an article that ran in Business Week, it talks about Google’s efforts, which are well known. This is an article from November in PCWorld: http://www.pcworld.com/article/210861/what_googles_nfc_android_phones_will_mean_for_you.html

But what I did not know is that Apple is also working on something, although it is rumored in the above article. Bank of Apple? But first things first, in order to fight the fight, you have to have a solution and this is probably why Apple has been active. A solution is already available in some Samsung and Nokia phones. Particularly in the new Google Nexus S, which is why Eric Schmidt all fired up on the stuff. What does this mean? Expect this to happen sooner than later because, well, competition and deep pockets that’s why. The phone is the easy side of the equation, getting merchants to sign on could be a bit more difficult. Why do we care? I’m not really sure why we care to be honest, it is simply pretty cool that you can carry money in your phone. Your ID and other information. Husam told me about one of his friends that has a credit card machine that attaches to his iPhone for poker night. This will eliminate the need for that, just a phone “bump” will take care it. If you are on a cold streak in Vegas? Don’t fret, bounce your phone off of the reader, enter your pin and get some chips. The reality is that we should be aware of the opportunities that may present themselves surrounding this. I assume that any money that we might make would be from payment processing or in security software, then again I have no idea. By telling you, now you are responsible too, even though the likelihood that you read this is fairly low. By my estimation, without having done any real research, NFC chips are very simple, very low power and very low cost. There are a number of standards that already exist and there is one of these chips in your card key, or is it key card, I always forget. Secure payment is the obvious solution, but the technology will work well for any secure exchange of data at close range such as boarding passes, electronic keys, coupons in the aisle etc. The credit card interchange fees will be/are threatened. I believe that the issuing banks feel the bulk of the pain, but I’m not sure. For the credit card companies, they will lose their take eventually. Australia has proven this to be possible by forcing the interchange rates down (those communists). There cannot be much terminal value in those oil wells for the credit card companies. However, they will certainly fight hard to maintain share by getting their NFC payment systems up to speed and forcing vendors to offer their service. In the end, I think Visa and Mastercard should probably start making phones…

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Random Thoughts

I think we are probably at peak oil. On the back of this, I can only assume that alternative energies are going to take off once again. This will be the second boom in alternative energies in the last five years. I believe that controls for electric motors might be a segment to look at. Of course, the obvious is battery technologies. Storing energy in large batteries may be an opportunity to harness lumpy energy sources such as wind and solar.

With population growth, we are certainly going to run out of food. We are also going to run out of basic materials. I believe that this will fuel inflation for the long-term. However, this inflation is different than the typical wage price spiral. As a result, it will equate to a lower standard of living. The reason for this is that it is not a monetary mechanism, but it is a function of simple lack of supply which causes basic materials and food to be spread over more and more people. That’s how you end up with a smaller chunk of a finite pie.

I believe that technology is where we will look for productivity gains. Of course, by definition this is what technology is. However, unique ways to organize, manage and display information will help workers become more productive. I believe that companies like ARM technologies will benefit the most, which as these simple designs will end up powering data centers. It is this simplicity across all segments that will win out. Simple and usable is a theme to look for.

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Opinions...

My response to an email that I received:

Tom, thanks for the message. I guess I really do not have much to add to this. I have opinions, but by definition opinions do not amount to much. I have one vote, and I’ll use it, but if I really felt inspired to change people, I suppose that I’d get into action and become an organizer. You know the saying, “Opinions are like…” Or “Actions speak louder than words”. I’ll readily admit that I’m doing nothing facilitate change, so I give my own banter almost no credit.

I’m pretty humble when it comes to my ability to predict what will happen and why. I suppose that it is because in my short history tracking and trying to predict this stuff, it almost always turns out to be the case that things are far different from what I originally envision. In 1989 (senior in high school) I wanted to move to a different country because I felt we were all doomed as the Japanese were eating our lunch and that I would have to feed on table scraps when I entered the workforce. That turned out to be about as far from reality I could have been – who wants to make cars anyway? It is a really shitty business.

In terms of Obama I guess, I would agree, that he wants to be the greatest leader of all-time and create a legacy for himself. This could scare me and maybe should scare me, but it does not. I think that one reason for this is the simple process of becoming The President of the United States, you really have to believe your own hype and I highly doubt that any of his predecessors thought differently. My very general opinion on him is that he is a politician that does not have very strong beliefs. I think he has gotten to where he is now by being a populist while influencing some of his audience (into the populist camp) through highly effective oration. In other words, promising the world to the largest constituencies, which works well as a senator but the jury is out if it works as a president, my guess is that it will not work. There are too many moving parts, you have to have beliefs and you have to be able to delegate, both of which he has not demonstrated to date. I think that what he is doing now is just politicking and it is certainly not what legacies are made of. I really think that he is struggling under the weight given the heterogeneity of the worldwide constituency and realizing that playing the middle ground may set him up for failure, he just doesn’t know how else to play it and it is confusing to him that he cannot please everyone. On one hand he is promising stuff (Copenhagen) that is likely not to be ratified by Congress (US Political System at work), having him lose face in front of his global peers. And on the other hand he is creating unsustainable programs at home in a precarious time in order to satisfy his constituents, which I think is all that he knows how to do. Everyone knew going in that he lacked foreign policy experience, well it is showing now. The side-effect for me, I have to say is pretty positive. I prefer be able to travel around the world without being hated, even if that is at the expense of an inept president – hard for others to understand for sure. He is in a tough spot right now. Will he get re-elected? I have no idea, it pretty much depends on the economy in 2011 as that email that you sent to me mentions and from where I sit, predicting the economy has always been impossible, so I have no idea.

My opinion on what happens from here is based on my belief that the political system in the United States is second-to-none and as such, baring a rewriting of the constitution, it will continue to work as well as any in the world. What is certainly true is that the US is in an era of unsustainable spending and this will likely result some social change. It is my opinion that throughout history, one thing is for certain, change is inevitable and real change, while it can happen abruptly (the fall of the Soviet Union) can also happen slowly, I hope the later occurs here.

Abrupt change could happen when Medicare and Social Security officially break, which it seems is likely to happen sooner rather than later. In the near term I’d expect that change on the spending front when the cost of borrowing rises and the system begins to show cracks under the burden of the higher cost of refinancing. If this is the case, the US will no longer be able to borrow to spend more (including borrowing against Medicare & Social Security). Inflation could be the way out and this is a problem. It will be tough for many, but it will provide opportunities for others (borrow now!). Some wealth redistribution will likely happen, but on the whole, I think those who have money will hang on to most of it. The people that will likely suffer (as % of income) the most will be people like me. However, what do people like me do? Look for loop holes in the tax code and given the tax code is set up to not be fair, we'll find them. Policing such a complex instrument is almost impossible so the tax revenues will fall (yes , I believe there to be some truth to the Laffer curve). When tax revenues fall, there will have to be cuts to services, thus pissing off the constituencies who put the president in place. In the end, to summarize, it is my opinion that free markets, transparency and fair rules prevail, but change is inevitable and barring some great new innovation (the Internet), it will result in some strife. But what gives me confidence is that the US has a culture that punishes corruption (many cultures embrace it) and it is backed by a superior political system (no system is perfect). Who knows, maybe Obama is better than I give him credit for being and that will be the surprise! Yes, I’m a proud American, but my opinions are just that, opinions. I don’t put any more or less weight in them versus those of others and as such is the reason that I tend to not listen to those of others. I’ll vote, I’ll work, but I don’t find happiness in trying to change opinions of others, so I refrain from that as much as possible.


P.S. I wouldn't read this if someone sent it to me!

This is the email below:

MIKE;
THIS GUY IS RESPECTED HIGHLY IN THE JOURNALISTIC WORLD. HIS COMMENT'S TOUCH ON WHAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT LAST NIGHT. SOME OF THI8S STUFF IS PRETTY IMPORTANT IN RELATION TO WHAT YOU DO. APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS?

Dr. Charles Krauthammer

Dr. Krauthammer is on Fox News. He is an M.D. and a lawyer and is paralyzed from the neck down. A friend went to hear Charles Krauthammer. He listened with 25 others in a closed room. What he says here, is NOT 2nd-hand but 1st. The ramifications are staggering for us, our children and their children.

Last Monday was a profound evening; Dr. Charles Krauthammer spoke to the Center for the American Experiment. He is a brilliant intellectual, seasoned & articulate. He is forthright and careful in his analysis, and never resorts to emotions or personal insults. He is NOT a fear monger nor an extremist in his comments and views . He is a fiscal conservative, and has received a Pulitzer Prize for writing. He is a frequent contributor to Fox News and writes weekly for the Washington Post.

The entire room was held spellbound during his talk.
I have summarized his comments, as we are living in uncharted waters economically and internationally. Even 2 Dems at my table agreed with everything he said! If you feel like forwarding this to those who are open minded and have not drunk the Kool-Aid, feel free.


Summary of his comments:

1. Mr. Obama is a very intellectual, charming individual. He is not to be underestimated. He is a cool customer who doesn't show his emotions. It's very hard to know what's behind the mask. The taking down of the Clinton dynasty was an amazing accomplishment. The Clintons still do not understand what hit them.
Obama was in the perfect place at the perfect time.

2. Obama has political skills comparable to Reagan and Clinton . He has a way of making you think he's on your side, agreeing with your position, while doing the opposite. Pay no attention to what he SAYS; rather, watch what he DOES!


3. Obama has a ruthless quest for power. He did not come to Washington to make something out of himself, but rather to change everything, including dismantling capitalism. He can't be straightforward on his ambitions, as the public would not go along. He has a heavy hand, and wants to level the playing field with income redistribution and punishment to the achievers of society. He would like to model the USA to Great Britain or Canada .

4. His three main goals are to control ENERGY, PUBLIC EDUCATION, and NATIONAL HEALTHCARE by the Federal government. He doesn't care about the auto or financial services industries, but got them as an early bonus. The cap and trade will add costs to everything and stifle growth. Paying for FREE college education is his goal. Most scary is his healthcare program, because if you make it FREE and add 46,000,000 people to a Medicare-type single-payer system, the costs will go through the roof. The only way to control costs is with massive RATIONING of services, like in Canada . God forbid!

5. He has surrounded himself with mostly far-left academic types. No one around him has ever even run a candy store. But they are going to try and run the auto, financial, banking and other industries. This obviously can't work in the long run. Obama is not a socialist; rather he's a far-left secular progressive bent on nothing short of revolution. He ran as a moderate, but will govern from the hard left. Again, watch what he does, not what he says.

6. Obama doesn't really see himself as President of the United States, but more as a ruler over the world. He sees himself above it all, trying to orchestrate & coordinate various countries and their agendas. He sees moral equivalency in all cultures. His apology tour in Germany and England was a prime example of how he sees America , as an imperialist nation that has been arrogant, rather than a great noble nation that has at times made errors. This is the first President ever who has chastised our allies and appeased our enemies!

7. He is now handing out goodies. He hopes that the bill (and pain) will not come due until after he is reelected in 2012. He would like to blame all problems on Bush from the past, and hopefully his successor in the future. He has a huge ego, and Dr. Krauthammer believes he is a narcissist.

8. Republicans are in the wilderness for a while, but will emerge strong. Republicans are pining for another Reagan, but there will never be another like him. Krauthammer believes Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty & Bobby Jindahl (except for his terrible speech in February) are the future of the party. Newt Gingrich is brilliant, but has baggage. Sarah Palin is sincere and intelligent, but needs to really be seriously boning up on facts and info if she is to be a serious candidate in the future. We need to return to the party of lower taxes, smaller government, personal responsibility, strong national defense, and state's rights.

9. The current level of spending is irresponsible and outrageous. We are spending trillions that we don't have. This could lead to hyperinflation, depression or worse. No country has ever spent themselves into prosperity. The media is giving Obama, Reid and Pelosi a pass because they love their agenda. But eventually the bill will come due and people will realize the huge bailouts didn't work, nor will the stimulus package.These were trillion-dollar payoffs to Obama's allies, unions and the Congress to placate the left, so he can get support for #4 above.

10. The election was over in mid-September when Lehman brothers failed, fear and panic swept in, we had an unpopular President, and the war was grinding on indefinitely without a clear outcome. The people are in pain, and the mantra of change caused people to act emotionally. Any Dem would have won this election; it was surprising it was as close as it was.

11. In 2012, if the unemployment rate is over 10%, Republicans will be swept back into power. If it's under 8%, the Dems continue to roll. If it's between 8-10%, it will be a dogfight. It will all be about the economy. I hope this gets you really thinking about what's happening in Washington and Congress. There is a left-wing revolution going on, according to Krauthammer, and he encourages us to keep the faith and join the loyal resistance. The work will be hard, but we're right on most issues and can reclaim our country, before it's far too late.

Do yourself a long term favor, send this to all who will listen to an intelligent assessment of the big picture. All our futures and children's futures depend on our good understanding of what is really going on in DC, and our action pursuant to that understanding!! It really IS up to each of us to take individual action!! Start with educating your friends and neighbors!!!